Integration
LMS Integration & Migration — Connect, Migrate, Modernise
Already running Moodle, TalentLMS, Docebo or a legacy platform? We migrate the data, plumb in SSO, payments, CRM and compliance reporting — and leave you with documentation.
An integration project is a scoped piece of engineering that connects an existing LMS to the systems around it — SSO providers, payment gateways, CRMs, regulator reporting endpoints — or migrates content and learners from one LMS to another.
Best fit: Teams hitting the limits of their current LMS · L&D buying compliance reporting they cannot pull from the LMS · Companies consolidating two or more LMS instances post-acquisition · Vendors needing white-label tenants on a parent platform
Quick Facts
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Engagement model | Fixed-scope per integration; audit phase first, billed €2,000 (credited) |
| Typical duration | 4–10 weeks depending on data complexity and source LMS |
| Source platforms migrated to date | Moodle, TalentLMS, Docebo, LearnDash, Canvas, custom legacy |
| Standards supported | SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004, xAPI, LTI 1.3, SCIM 2.0, OIDC, SAML 2.0 |
| Data migration coverage | Courses, learner records, completions, certificates, transactions |
| Post-launch support | 90 days bundled; bug fixes and observability tuning |
| Documentation | Architecture diagram, runbook, integration spec — handed over at sign-off |
What does a typical integration project look like end to end?
Audit, scope, build, parallel run, cutover. Two to three milestones, weekly demos, fixed fee, with the audit fee credited against the build.
The audit (1–2 weeks) maps the source system: data model, custom fields, plugin dependencies, integration touch points, hidden assumptions in the database. We deliver a written audit report — usually 15–25 pages — with a clear migration plan and risk register.
The build runs in two-week sprints. For migrations we set up a parallel environment first, run a sample dataset through it, and only then schedule the full cutover. We've never done a "big bang" cutover and we will not start now; the parallel run pattern is non-negotiable.
Cutover happens on a planned weekend with a rollback path. You get a runbook, an architecture diagram, and a 90-day support window where any data anomaly or integration glitch is on us.
Which integrations do you handle most often?
SSO, payment gateways, CRM sync, compliance reporting, and certificate verification — in roughly that order of frequency.
SSO is the most-requested integration: Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Auth0, Keycloak. We've done over 30 SSO setups across SAML and OIDC and the work is now well-templated.
Payment gateways come second: Stripe, Mollie, Adyen, Paddle, plus regional providers like LiqPay and Fondy. Subscription handling, refunds, dunning, tax-rate-by-region — all scoped explicitly.
CRM sync — usually HubSpot, Pipedrive or Salesforce — closes the loop between learner activity and the sales/account team. The pattern is event-driven: course completion fires a webhook, the CRM updates the contact record.
Compliance reporting is the integration that least often exists out of the box. Regulators want CSV exports on a schedule, sometimes via SFTP, sometimes via a regulator-specific API. We build it, schedule it, and add monitoring so you know when it stops working.
What can go wrong, and how do you protect against it?
Migrations fail when source data is dirtier than the audit assumed, or when stakeholders discover requirements during cutover. Both are mitigated by parallel runs and written sign-offs.
Two things kill migration projects: data quality and late requirements. We protect against both deliberately.
Data quality is addressed in the audit. We pull a representative sample (usually 5–10% of the dataset) into a sandbox, run the migration logic, and surface anomalies in writing before any contracts are signed for the build phase. If the audit reveals that the data needs cleaning before migration, we either include the cleanup in scope or recommend you do it first.
Late requirements are addressed by a written sign-off at the end of each sprint and a fixed change-order process. New requirements after sign-off get a written delta quote. This is unromantic but it works.
Frequently asked questions
Can you migrate without downtime?
For most projects yes — parallel run plus dual-write, then DNS cutover. Full zero-downtime requires source system support; we audit feasibility upfront.
The honest answer is that 'zero downtime' depends on the source system. Modern APIs and stable data models make it routine; legacy systems with custom database mods sometimes need a 30–90 minute maintenance window. We tell you the answer in the audit, not after the contract.
Do you handle SCORM-to-xAPI conversion?
Yes. We've converted SCORM 1.2 and 2004 packages to xAPI, including question banks and tracking statements.
We have an internal LMS team. Can you work alongside them?
Yes. We integrate with internal teams as augmentation rather than replacement, with clear ownership boundaries written into the SOW.
What's the smallest integration project you'll take?
We take projects from €12,000 upward. Smaller pieces are usually better handled inside an existing rental or build engagement.
Want a working version of this on your domain?
A 30-minute call is enough to know whether this fits. We'll be honest about whether rental, build or a different vendor is right.